Writing and Research
J. Pitney
CMC Government Department
Click here for an example of a Gov 101 paper.
Click here for an example of a Gov 106 paper.
Click here for Turabian citation guide.
Writing
- Revise and rewrite.
- Never use a long Latinate word when a short Anglo-Saxon one will do.
- Cut needless words
- Mindless introductory phrases (“It is important to keep in mind the fact that”);
- Redundancies (“[T]o dismiss the case would be unprecedented from a historical standpoint, because it has never been done before.” -- Asa Hutchinson, 1/25/99)
- Write with nouns and verbs, not adjectives and adverbs.
- Shun the passive voice and forms of the verb to be. Use active verbs.
- Vary the length of your sentences and paragraphs.
- Make your point at the start. Use the rest of the essay to support it.
- In a short essay, do not end with a summary. When you have finished, just stop.
- Never use contractions in academic writing.
- Proofread. The computer will not catch all your mistakes.
- Choose your words carefully. Never use feel for think, verbal for oral, incredibly for very, or novel for a work of non-fiction. See
- Stay off tangents. Cut anything that fails to advance your argument. In academic essays, avoid sermonettes. (“However, I feel that Franklin Pierce was an incredibly lousy president under who, the national polity was lead into it's crucial crisis ...”)
Research
Check your facts. Do not trust your memory.
Do not believe a claim just because you find it in print or on the Internet. Ask
· Does the source have a bias?
· How did the source get the information?
· Does the source have a reputation for thoroughness and accuracy?
Cite your sources unless the material is well-known (George Washington served as the first President) or self-evident (two and two make four). In citing your sources, use a standard reference such as Turabian . You should own such a manual but if you need a another short onlineguide, see: http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/DocChicago.html
Do not take data out of context. In the movie JFK, Oliver Stone shows footage of President Kennedy saying: “In the final analysis, it is their [the Vietnamese] war. They are the ones who must win it or lose it.” Stone uses this clip to suggest that JFK wanted to pull out of Vietnam. But he omits what JFK said a few moments later: “All we can do is help, and we are making it clear, but I don't agree with those who say we should withdraw. That would be a great mistake.”[1] There may well be evidence that JFK did want to withdraw, but that interview does not suffice.
Build your argument from facts and logic, not just from quotations by those who agree with you. Acknowledge contrary data or arguments. You may refute them, but you may not neglect them.
Beware letting your conclusions get ahead of your evidence. When you discover that Bill Clinton went to Moscow and Prague, you should not automatically conclude that he served as a KGB agent.
Do not underestimate the time you must spend. But do not give up too easily.
Pitney’s List of Dumbass Mistakes
affect effect
angle angel
Capital Capitol
cite site sight
counsel council
fare fair
heel heal
its it’s
lead led
lose loose
mute moot
perspective prospective
pole poll
populace populous
principal principle
tenet tenant
than then
their there they’re
vain vein vane
verses versus
warehouse Wherehouse Wearhouse
whose who’s
I have a spelling checker,
It came with my PC.
It plainly marks four my revue
Mistakes I cannot sea.
I’ve run this poem threw it,
I’m shore your pleas too no,
Its letter perfect in it’s weigh,
My checker tolled me sew.
Quotation and Plagiarism
Your paper should consist mainly of your own words. You must avoid plagiarism. Carefully review the definition of the term at http://registrar.claremontmckenna.edu/acpolicy/plagiarism.asp
At the same time, you should also avoid excessive quotations of secondary sources. Put the ideas or information into your own words, then cite. Whenever you do use direct quotations, name the source in your text. See http://www.virtualsalt.com/quotehlp.htm
Do not write this way:
This article offers a new strategy for examining the legitimacy question in public administration and representative government. A genealogy of political discourses is proposed to suggest that political forms have historically relied on a constitutive exclusion. The U.S. Constitution and administrative state are conceived of as events in this genealogy but are unique in that both deny the ontologically constitutive effect of the exclusion. Administration and constitutionalism are described as liberal political technologies, deployed to re-present and fabricate "the People," that is, to bring into reality the organic totality that is ontologically presupposed.
-- Some academic person
Write this way:
[S]ome persons will shun crime even if we do nothing to deter them, while others will seek it out even if we do everything to reform them. Wicked people exist. Nothing avails except to set them apart from innocent people. And many people, neither wicked nor innocent, but watchful, dissembling, and calculating of their opportunities, ponder our reaction to wickedness as a cue to what they might profitably do. We have trifled with the wicked, made sport of the innocent, and encouraged the calculators. Justice suffers, and so do we all.
-- James Q. Wilson
[1] Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: John F. Kennedy 1963 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1964), p. 652.